Do you think an election government led by neutral Prime Minister is a better option to end the deadlock?
Yes it is the best idea in this current situation as political parties are in a deadlock. A neutral person would be a reasonable option to end current deadlock and standoff between so called democrats and socialists.
Yes, a neutral government is the only option to hold fresh election and end the current deadlock.
No. We need a person who is competent not neutral to conduct elections on time.
Does it make any difference? There is no sense of neutrality in Nepal, especially among politicians.
Yes that's good but ministers from all parties should be there so that it will be a national unity government.
How do you define neutral? Does neutral mean some one one who doesn't belong to any party??
Please participate in our Voxpop section through our Facebook page. Comments may be edited for clarity. - Ed