logo
top nav left img
  • About Us
  • Send Us News
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Info
  • Feedback
top nav right img

-
Ten Indian army officials including four women scale Mt Everest
CA meeting deferred again
President Yadav urges parties to reach consensus to within CA's deadline
Australian Embassy provides protective glasses to traffic police
Handicraft export up by 40 pc
Four party meet over May 27 crisis ends without making concrete decision
Indefinite Sankhuwasabha strike withdrawn
RJP hails SC verdict on CA term extension
NC hands over resignation of its ministers to PM
UCPN (M) decides to wage struggle if CA is dissolved without promulgating constitution

eXTReMe Tracker
The Supreme Court's refusal to register the review petition on its verdict on the Constituent Assembly's term has courted controversy with major parties speaking for and against the SC's decision.
Thursday, 12 January 2012 18:54 Read this : 9360 times
  • Share this
    • Twitter
    • Myspace
    • Mister Wong
    • Digg
    • Del.icio.us
    • Jumptags
    • StumbleUpon
    • Slashdot
    • Furl
    • Yahoo
    • Technorati
    • Newsvine
    • Blinkbits
    • Ma.Gnolia
    • Smarking
    • Googlize this
    • Blinklist
    • Facebook
    • Wikio
  • Export PDF
  • Print
  • E-mail
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
first photo
The political parties should be able to rise above partisan interest in order to draft the constitution. The constitution must be written within deadline this time around. The Supreme Court’s ruling is correct because the court has no political interests.
Shankar Kumar Koirala, lawyer
second photo
We should respect the supremacy of law. Now the parties should concentrate on drafting the constitution within the deadline.
Tej Naryan Chaudhary, lawyer
third photo
Parties might have different opinions about the Supreme Court’s ruling, but what’s important is that the constitution should be written within the remaining tenure of the Constituent Assembly. The parties were just extending the CA’s term.
Jagadish Dahal, lawyer
forth photo
The parties cannot extend the CA’s term indefinitely. I find the court verdict very timely.
Bhumika Adhikari, government employee
fifth photo
It is in the interest of the political parties to abide by the court’s order because we all know that successive extension of CA’s term did not give us new constitution. There is no point opposing the court order in the present scenario.
Ram Prasad Shrestha, jobholder
sixth photo
People tolerated the parties a lot. I fully support the court’s order.
Saraswoti Panta, jobholder
 


2012 © Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd.