‘Nepali pharmaceutical sector needs protective surgery’
smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
 
Like in other key sectors, there is a pathetic lack of visionary plans and concrete policies to effectively govern the country’s pharmaceutical business. Even though the Rs 8 billion Nepali pharmaceutical sector holds immense potentials in terms of further expansion, the state is shying away from even conferring the status of a most essential industry to it.  Undeniably, Nepali pharma companies are currently catering to some 35 percent of the total demand of the medicines in the country. And, it goes without saying that to give a fresh impetus to the sector there is a glaring need of combined efforts of both the state and the concerned players.

 
In an interview with Nirjal Dhungana of nepalnews.com, Umesh Lal Shrestha, president, Association of Pharmaceutical Producers of Nepal (APPON), urged the government to come up with well orchestrated strategies to protect and promote domestic pharma companies. He also believes this sort of move will go a long way in reducing the country’s dependency on foreign pharmaceutical producers to a great extent. Excerpts:
 
How well Nepali pharma sector is moving?
 
The sector is still in its infancy. As a matter of fact, the sector begun to take a modern shape in early 80s.  And it was only in late 90s that the sector started witnessing a proliferation in the number of pharmaceutical companies. As of today, we have 44 domestic pharmaceutical industries. Likewise, 200 pharma companies mainly from Indian and Bangladesh are also operating as major players in the country. To sum up, the country’s pharma sector is growing at a healthy clip.
 
How do you asses the quality benchmark of domestic pharmaceutical companies?
 
Of course, when we talk about arithmetic aspect of pharma sector, it will be sheer injustice to overlook quality factor.  Out of the total of 44 domestic companies, 18 have been awarded with WHO-GMP certification. And, the rest have been recognized with National GMP certification. So, this is a perfect testimony to the fact that products of Nepali pharmaceutical companies comply with required quality standards. And, of course they are in position to compete with foreign ones.
 
What do you think are the major factors that are hindering the domestic pharma sector?
 
Well, the question is very pertinent.  First of all, the government has been lackadaisical towards facilitating the growth of domestic pharma sector. It has already been two decades that we have been asking the concerned authorities for some visionary support. However, it is frustrating to say that there has been no institutional support on the part of the state.  If the concerned bodies had shown a scintilla of seriousness to stimulate the domestic drugs companies, their growth would have been much more robust and vigorous. As of now, domestic companies are catering to only 35 percent of the total demand of pharmaceutical products in the country. And, the rest is being fulfilled by importing foreign products. Undeniably, it is not possible for any country to be fully self-reliant in pharmaceutical sector.  Even the most developed countries are not self-dependent in pharma products. In any country, the government lends support to any growing industry.

Since Nepali pharma sector is among the fast-growing industries, it behooves the government to lend justifiable support to buttress its growth.  However, the same is not happening in our case.
 
What sort of support you are seeking exactly from the government?  
 
The government should bring well-defined laws to protect the local phrama firms from the onslaught of giant foreign producers.  We don’t have to go very far to see how other countries have framed protective laws to ensure the consistent growth of their local companies.
 
For instance, India and Bangladesh have introduced such protective legislative mechanisms that have prevented foreign pharma producers to expand their presence in these countries.This strategy has resulted in the phenomenal growth of pharma industries in India and Bangladesh.  In Bangladesh, there are 200 pharma companies and all of them are domestic. Unfortunately, in our context, there is no single law that is designed to promote the domestic pharma sector. And, the most unfortunate part is that Nepali pharma sector has not yet been conferred with the status of one of most essential industries.
 
In the context of globalization and liberal economy, how suitable is it to clamour for protection from the state?
 
In today’s globalised world, I am not saying that Nepali pharma sector is in need of complete protection on the part of state. At the same time, I also do not mean that the government should immediately stop importing foreign drugs. The sector has become strong and stable in a considerable number of aspects.  We are providing a wide range of quality pharma products at a very economical rate. So, the government does not need to import those products in which we have competitive edge.  The government does not seem to be well aware of various structural and legal problems that have long been dogged the sector. The imposition of an exorbitant 40 percent customs duty while importing equipments related to quality control is a case in point. These equipments are expensive and the imposition of import duty of this magnitude has only discouraged us from pouring adequate investment into research and development.  What I trying to convey is that the government has grossly overlooked the fact that the pharmaceutical sector demands cutting-edge tools and equipments to align itself with globally evolving trends and techniques. As such, the government must pencil a package to give possible rebates to the domestic pharma sector for its smooth growth.  This sort of move will also go a long way in enabling local pharma producers to compete with multinational giants. And, of course, the empowerment of local companies will play instrumental role in mitigating the country’s dependency on foreign drugs to a great extent. nepalnews.com

Readers are kindly requested to avoid using offensive language and also refrain from issuing threats to others.
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
+/- View Comments
Search
As postings are shown online immediately, please be warned of offensive comments
Monalisha Pyakuryal  - Scientist   |99.29.228.xxx |2009-11-17 17:50:40
First of all, I would like to thank you Umeshji for giving this interview and
inform us the current status of pharma world in Nepal. I was highly impressed by
the numbers and its future potential of growth. I have left Nepal in early 90s
and started my career in pharmaceutical industry in United State almost 8 years
ago. You know, last time I checked, Nepali pharmaceutical companies don't make a
lot of money and not many of them were survived– not that they couldn't be
better.

I also wanted to add a note; it seems, then, that the
responsibilities of Nepali pharmaceutical companies in terms of a right to
health of Nepali people have become well-defined except from minor perks. These
obligations need to be ist by not only government, but each individual involved
in engineering a better drug development to commercialization process through
scientific excellence to ensure that Nepali companies fulfill their
responsibility...
Anonymous   |165.91.28.xxx |2009-11-16 14:33:01
The point Umeshji makes is true to certain point, but I disagree when he speaks
of research and development. Let me ask you Umeshji, what percent of your
earning goes to research and development activities? How many
researchers/scientists are working for pharma companies in Nepal? Don't count
the technicians and pharmacists that you employ to manufacture drug. What I see
is that pharma companies adopt everything from the company from which you buy
raw material to compound drugs. The principle components and other additives are
all imported. What you do is only compound and sell. How do you contribute to
research that way. I do not believe that you have a mechanism established even
to keep track of the outcome on the patient who is treated with your drug. Nepal
is a law less country ruled by the outfits and it's going to continue on this
line unless a true leader is born to sacrifice than to extort and deliver the
people fro...
Dika  - He is generally right   |115.64.201.xxx |2009-11-11 10:51:42
Umesh ji is basically right that the customs for any technology import should be
minimized. In fact if Nepal is to develop utilizing the foreign technology and
equipments that can not be manufactured in Nepal, Nepal should encourage by
providing subsidies rather than taxing them. For example, there is no point
taxing 200% on import of Cars, becasue first Nepal does not have capacity to
manufacture cars within the country, secondly Nepal needs fast technology
including cars and other heavy vehicles to bring about industrial development.
Ownins a car should not be made a far distant dream for a nepali youth and
professionals. Once ordinary citizen can have a car for their work and travel,
Nepale youths will not need to leave the country to fulfil the dream of riding a
car. Like wise in every industry, where there is no domestic technology or
capacity, the taxes should be relaxed with a long term vision. There is no point
taxi...
Anonymous  - Pharma industries-' see yourself before bleming ot   |202.170.57.xxx |2009-11-11 10:21:03
I am in favour of the statement but concurrently,i would like to quote a proverb
' see yourself before bleming others'. Medicine is a life saving item not like a
general store item. What about the GMP certification? why only ~41% pharma
industries are GMP certified?
GUNJAN DC   |113.199.146.xxx |2009-11-06 03:28:40
In the present context of Globalization is it justifiable to look for the
protection from government?? if yes what kind of the protection will it be??
instead of asking for protection it will be wiser to go for expolring foreign
market. why Nepali companies are not going to foreign market. is it because of
the Quality or management problem??
Raj Thapa  - Pharmaceuticals Companies in Nepal.   |202.79.59.xxx |2009-11-05 08:45:57
In my opinion, the blame goes equally to the enterpreuniers and the
Govt.sectors both.

Are the producers following the ethics of so called WHO-
GMP Guildlines in the that way should be !
Does the government sectors(DDA)
have understand the norms and regulations as mentioned in the WHO-GMP Guildlines
!

To streamline the both, it may take a century more to rectify these
problems.
markolee  - Toxicologist is must in pharmaceutical company   |147.91.1.xxx |2009-11-04 12:28:34
In major company like Ranbaxy. they must have one toxicologist. But I don't know
this trend in Nepal.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."